For example, authors including Homer ( The Iliad), William Shakespeare ( Henry IV), and Charles Dickens ( A Tale of Two Cities) wrote about traumatic experiences and the symptoms that followed such events. Literary accounts offer the first descriptions of what we now call posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Attacks by saber tooth tigers or twenty-first century terrorists have likely led to similar psychological responses in survivors of such violence. ) entered the standard American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 1980 and the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases in 1992.Exposure to traumatic experiences has always been a part of the human condition. Footnote 1 The diagnosis has been an attempt to create a universal, objective psychiatric description of the psychological consequences of traumatic stress, and to thus medically standardize the observation and treatment of traumatized patients. The key premises behind PTSD are, first, that there exist traumatic events that cannot be processed within the normal spectrum of human experiencing second, that those events as such can cause long-term psychological consequences for the victim third, that these consequences take the form of “traumatic memory ” and fourth, that its symptoms form a distinctive disorder separate from other mental disorders. Footnote 2Īs Peter Leese points out in his introduction to this volume, PTSD as a combination of psychiatric knowledge is a historically constructed concept. As several studies on the genealogy of PTSD have demonstrated, its birth in the United States was bound to the politicized atmosphere surrounding the Vietnam War in the 1960s and 1970s. A new generation of psychiatrists started to advocate a concept of war trauma which would be medically valid but also socially just and morally acceptable. Finally, and after heated debates, this advocacy gave birth to the diagnosis of PTSD. Footnote 4 Historians have joined in the critique of PTSD’s timeless validity: it is not possible to take the current psychiatric paradigm as universal knowledge that can be applied as such to past experiences.įootnote 3 It has also been pointed out how PTSD’s “objective” scientific premises are embedded in a particular Western culture of mental illness and individual subjectivity, whereas human responses to potentially traumatizing events are diverse, historically and culturally conditioned, and often do not correlate with the diagnostic criteria of PTSD. In the humanities, in cultural studies, and in social sciences concerned with the concept of trauma, there is thus a strong constructivist focus on the idea of posttraumatic memory and its changing manifestations. From this perspective, trauma and PTSD are seen as discursively produced conglomerations of psychiatric knowledge. Yet my concern in this chapter is not to underline the historical and cultural sensitivity of trauma’s conceptualizations, although I have done so elsewhere. Footnote 6 In the critique of the universality of the PTSD paradigm, it has been natural to emphasize temporal changes and cultural variations in human reactions to violence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |